Перейти к содержимому

[Краткий паспорт] Tempest Mk II [предварительно настроен в 1.37]


ElBarca

Может потому что в настройках доступны на выбор мили/ч и узлы?

Аааа, ну тогда само собой где то здесь ошибка.

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Поделиться сообщением


Ссылка на сообщение
Поделиться на других сайтах

  • 1 год спустя...

Неправильно настроенна летная модель, площадь крыла очень большая, а маневренность на уровне ил10(((. Двигатель мощьнее чем у тайфуна позднего, да и крыло больше, масса всего на 300кг больше, а управляемость как у какашки... Тоже самое и  с темпестом V

medal medal medal medal

Поделиться сообщением


Ссылка на сообщение
Поделиться на других сайтах

В 18.05.2017 в 18:44, SF_5 сказал:

Неправильно настроенна летная модель, площадь крыла очень большая, а маневренность на уровне ил10(((. Двигатель мощьнее чем у тайфуна позднего, да и крыло больше, масса всего на 300кг больше, а управляемость как у какашки... Тоже самое и  с темпестом V

Дожили: жалуются на маневренность у Темпеста Mk.V. Полетай на мессерах с подвесами, тебе этот темпест зерошкой покажется. И это при том, что темпест - не про манёвры самолёт.  Что касается 300кг массы, то все зависит от того, куда эта масса приложена. Центровка смещается вперёд и ура, встречайте бревно.

 

А теперь по теме: не планируется ли в ближайшее время темпестам паспорта обновить до удобных и полюбившимся всем таблиц?

medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal medal

Поделиться сообщением


Ссылка на сообщение
Поделиться на других сайтах

  • 2 года/лет спустя...

темпест 2 надо править по крайней мере по управляемости. почему он должен затяжелятся в пике, если темпест 5 не затяжелялся, а аеродинамическая схема одна и та же?
вот про управляемость в полете

 

Скрытый текст

 

HANDLING IN THE AIR

Take-Off

20.            Full port rudder trim should be used, and the throttle opened slowly as the aircraft tends to swing to starboard. The swing is slightly worse than on the Tempest V, but can be easily controlled on the rudder. At an engine setting of +8 ½ lbs. boost, taking off into a wind of 10 -15 m.p.h. the take-off run from runways is approximately 350 yards. The aircraft unsticks cleanly at 100 A.S.I. There is a slight tendency for the right wing to drop if the aircraft is "pulled off" too early.

Landing

21.            The actual landing, if made with a little motor, is normal. A. & A.E.E. state that the right wing may drop of the aircraft is held off to high. The elevator control is not sufficient in a glide landing to make a three-point touch down. On aircraft fitted with the automatic gill and oil cooler shut as the stalling speed is increased by some 5 m.p.h. with the oil cooler open. After touch-down the aircraft displays a tendency to swing to port. This can be controlled on the brakes but care should be taken to avoid over-correction.

Flying Controls

22.            The rudder is pleasantly heavy and positive. Less re-trimming than on the Tempest V is necessary with changes in speed and power.

23.            Aileron control is rather heavy, but the response is positive and immediate throughout the speed range. Aileron control should be comparable to the Tempest V but it will be found to vary from aircraft to aircraft.

24.            The elevator control is moderately light and is adequate for all flying except as previously stated in a glide landing. Changes of speed and power have less effect on the trim of the aircraft than on the Tempest V or other contemporary British fighter.

25.            Trimming tabs are provided for rudder and elevators. In flight, less re-trimming is necessary than on the Tempest V, but a little extra port trim would be an advantage for take-off. There is also insufficient port trim to be able to fly 'feet off' when climbing under maximum conditions.

General Handling

26.            The Tempest II is slightly unstable in pitch at heights in excess of 15,000 ft. at all speeds. In a tight turn there is a tendency for the aircraft to tighten up especially at altitude. Neither of these characteristics is sufficiently pronounced to cause embarrassment to the pilot. The aircraft is stable in the yawing plane. At all times the aircraft is very pleasant to handle and easy to fly. The usual warning of the high speed stall is given by pronounced buffeting and aileron snatch. The general impression is that the Tempest II handles better that the Tempest V.

27.            The interconnection of throttle and pitch is simple to operate. The present oil cooling system is unacceptable for operational use, as high oil temperatures are experienced in prolonged climbs, or prolonged periods at high throttle settings. Throttle settings between economical cruising boost and rated boost gates should be avoided where possible as the combination of mixture strength and boost at these settings is liable to cause detonation and high cylinder temperatures. Should operational conditions demand their use, for example formation flying, a close watch should be kept on the cylinder head temperature gauge.

28.            Between 1600 and 2000 r.p.m. and to a lesser extent at maximum power, there is a considerable vibration, but there is no indication that this vibration is likely to cause damage to either the airframe of engine. In fact the Centaurus has been found to be most reliable mechanically.

 

Low Flying

30.            The Tempest II is a pleasant aircraft for low flying.

Aerobatics

31.            The Tempest II is excellent for all aerobatic manoeuvres and there is no tendency for the nose to wander when manoeuvring in the rolling plane.
 

Dive

49.            The two aircraft are identical.

Turning Circles

50.            There is very little to choose between the two aircraft, if anything the Tempest V appears to have a slight advantage.

Rates of Roll

51.            During the trials carried out, the Tempest II proved definitely superior to the Tempest V at speeds up to 500 m.p.h. I.A.S. As the two aircraft have the same airframe there appears to be no aerodynamic reason for why the Tempest II should be better. It is therefore assumed that the ailerons on Tempest II MW.754 are above the average, and may not be truly

representative of a production aircraft.

Conclusions

52.            The Tempest II is superior to the Tempest V in every way, except in the turn where it is at a slight disadvantage.

Изменено пользователем _BEE_
medal medal medal medal medal

Поделиться сообщением


Ссылка на сообщение
Поделиться на других сайтах

  • 2 года/лет спустя...

Не планируется ли обновление паспорта самолета? А то на фоне других, этот паспорт неинформативен

medal medal medal medal

Поделиться сообщением


Ссылка на сообщение
Поделиться на других сайтах

  • Сейчас на странице   0 пользователей

    Нет пользователей, просматривающих эту страницу

×
×
  • Создать...